The thrill? It understands. Whether it’s a sketch, a monster, or an icon, Midjourney sees the character within and brings it to life, dancing in styles you only dreamed of animating yourself.
Websterix
Midjourney Video: Unmatched Value Per Second, But Experimentation Comes at a Premium (Week One)
The generative AI landscape just shifted dramatically. Midjourney, renowned for its evocative image generation, has officially launched its video model, and the initial technical performance is undeniably impressive. While the core technology dazzles, the current user experience reveals significant friction points, particularly for those wanting to explore its potential.
Technical Brilliance: Character Understanding & Style Mastery
The standout feature is the model’s exceptional ability to interpret and animate characters. This extends far beyond humans, showcasing remarkable proficiency with non-human entities, fantastical creatures, and highly stylized cartoon figures. Whether it’s intricate anime, whimsical illustrations, or surreal concepts, Midjourney Video consistently identifies key elements and translates them into coherent motion. This deep understanding of visual intent, especially concerning „character“ across diverse aesthetics, feels like a major advance.
Furthermore, its range of animation styles is compelling. It convincingly adapts to the input image’s aesthetic, generating everything from smooth cinematic sequences to expressive cartoonish motion. Early outputs demonstrate surprising sophistication in visual fidelity and motion logic for a first-week release, with many testers reporting „flawless“ results in terms of understanding and translating the source image.
The Operational Reality: Value vs. Experimentation
However, the brilliance of the core tech is counterbalanced by operational choices impacting user workflow:
-
The „Cheapest Per Second“ Crown (With a Caveat): On pure output metrics, Midjourney Video currently holds a significant title: it is demonstrably the cheapest video generation model per second of footage produced. This raw cost efficiency is a major draw.
-
The Mandatory Quad-Gen Problem: Yet, this value proposition is complicated by the structure: every video prompt generates four outputs simultaneously, regardless of user need. There’s no option to generate fewer. This feels fundamentally suboptimal. While it increases the chance of getting one good clip, it forces users to pay for three additional variations they may instantly discard.
-
Price Per Second vs. Price Per Useful Experiment: This mandatory bulk generation drastically alters the value calculation. Users effectively get only one-quarter (or less) of the meaningful experimental generations compared to image generation before exhausting their „Fast Hours“ credits. You pay for 4 attempts, but often only value one. The „cheapest per second“ quickly becomes „expensive per desired outcome“ when 75% of outputs are potentially unwanted.
-
The Missing Relaxed Mode: Compounding this is the absence of Relaxed Mode for video across all paid tiers. Video generation is locked solely behind the premium „Fast Hours“ paywall. This eliminates the option for lower-stakes, slower experimentation crucial for learning the engine and exploring ideas without burning through credits. Its removal is deeply felt, especially during this initial exploration phase.
Week One Verdict: Stunning Potential, Costly Exploration
Midjourney Video’s core achievement – its ability to animate complex characters coherently across styles – is genuinely groundbreaking for a first public release. The technical quality justifies much of the early hype.
However, the current implementation prioritizes raw output cost efficiency over user-centric experimentation. The forced 4-output generation, combined with the exclusive reliance on Fast Hours, creates a significant barrier to playing with the tool. While you get more seconds for your dollar than anywhere else, the cost per useful, desired experimental clip can feel high due to the mandatory bulk generation.
A Powerful, Yet Pricy Playground
Midjourney Video is undeniably a powerful and technically impressive tool, offering unmatched seconds-per-dollar value. Its character understanding deserves the accolades. But as the initial excitement settles (moving past the inevitable „screaming and shouting surface slide“ of AI launches), the operational limitations for iterative exploration become clear.
For now, approach Midjourney Video with awe for its capabilities and appreciation for its raw cost efficiency, but also with a clear strategy for your Fast Hours budget. Be prepared for the cost of experimentation to feel steep due to the mandatory outputs. The hope is that Midjourney addresses the community’s feedback on output choice and Relaxed Mode access, aligning the user experience more closely with the brilliance of the underlying engine. The potential is immense, but realizing it fully requires lowering the barrier to experimentation.
Midjourney video: Where every still image whispers, ‚Watch what happens next…‘ and you actually get to see it
Websterix
